That wasn't my first lesson in losing of course but it was one that stuck with me since we tended to not play games as a family that often. When I was a little older I did play chess, Orthello and cribagge with my dad and won as many as I lost but without those earlier lessons in losing, I wouldn't have been very much fun to play.
The boy is four now, and has already had a few lessons in defeat. Primarily at games that aren't skill based, like Pop Up Pirate, where even if I wanted to (and I'm not sure I do), I can't let him win. There have been tears, shouting and upset but at the end he wants to play again. I don't think there is anything wrong with being competitive.
Back in 2005 some well meaning teacher caused a bit of a storm by suggesting that failure be replaced with deferred success, saying that some kids got depressed if they faced failure. To my mind, the deferred success route was wrong: the kids simply needed to be taught that to try and fail is acceptable.
![]() |
| no running, someone might not be as fast as you! |
Of course learning to be gracious in victory is as important as learning to be dignified in defeat, something that seems to have been missed in the drive to non competitive sports at schools.
And dammit, there wasn't a dads race :)

The old saying, " if you dont succeed at first try try again " is one I think holds true to life. So Im with you nothing wrong with winners and losers, it is a learning experience we all need.
ReplyDeleteDepriving our young of the experience only means the lesson will hurt more later on as at some point it has to be learnt. Is it not what drives us to try harder? Failure is as important as success and sometimes more so.